[ By Date ] [ By Message ] [ By Subject ] [ By Author ]
Yes, re-run proves definite misstatement by MP mayor on height of high
speed train and it is the only alternative offered.
Why pay for a lobbyist when there are dozens of organizations, such as above, with local residents as watchdogs?
The status of assembly and senate bills can be followed on the web at a glance and letters or comments can be sent certified to ensure receipt or attention. Surely expensive paid staff can handle that, or continue with volunteers.
Menlo Park, Palo Alto and Atherton are still trying to stop the train by listening to Gary Patton, speaking at the Peninsula Consortium meeting Friday, March 19, Menlo Park Council Chambers at 8:15 a.m.
Are they really joining in the lawsuits of the East Bay and paying their lobbyist to get the high speed train switched to Altamont? It would still come through MP.
Definite need for legal action to stop the cities from wasting money to make paid lobbyists and lawyers rich.
Win Smith
attached mail follows:
http://www.ca4hsr.org/ Received on Mon Mar 15 2010 - 10:05:01 PDT
[ Home ] [ By Date ] [ By Message ] [ By Subject ] [ By Author ] [ 05/06 Archive ] [ 07/08 Archive ][ Watch City Council Meetings ]
Email communications sent to the City Council are public records. This site is an archive of emails received by the City Council at its city.council@menlopark.org email address. The posting process is automated and can cause formatting issues when viewed from the website. File attachments sent to this address can be viewed as a link from the main message body. Please note the City Council is also copied on each correspondence. This site can be viewed by the public and sorted by subject, date, author or message thread. The email address of the sender is not disclosed for security purposes. It is the City's practice to remove SPAM (Unsolicited Bulk Email) email from the Council email log. If you believe your email has been removed in error, please contact the City at ccin.log@menlopark.org.