Logo


Menlo Park City Council Email Log

[ Home ] [ City Council ] [ Search ] [ 05/06 Archive ] [ 07/08 Archive ] [ 09/10 Archive ] [ 2011 Archive ] [ 12/13 Archive ] [ Watch City Council Meetings ]


RE: Heritage tree ordinance changes

From: Bonner, Christian R <"Bonner,>
Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2014 09:04:33 -0800

Hi Naomi,
Thank you for your interest in the review of our Heritage Tree ordinance. The intent of the review is to assure the ordinance is effective in maintaining our large population of significant trees in Menlo Park.

Each application for removal is evaluated individually in order to guarantee that a conscientious decision is being made to determine if it falls within the parameters of the ordinance for removal. It can be a significant challenge to balance the necessity of safeguarding property and the needs of home owners with determining if substantial trees are appropriate for removal or retention. Nonetheless, we make every effort to evaluate each tree on its merits and make thoughtful decisions in order to conserve the city's valuable Heritage Tree resource.

We are currently in the process of updating the 2013-2014 Heritage Tree removal information on the city web site. In the meantime, I have attached a summary of all Heritage Tree removals and denials for the last 3 years as well as a graph depicting the purpose for removal when approved.



Regards,
Christian Bonner, City Arborist
City of Menlo Park
650-330-6793


From: Naomi Goodman <nlgoodman_at_(domainremoved)
Date: December 17, 2014 at 11:06:53 AM PST
To: _CCIN <councilmail_at_(domainremoved)
Subject: Heritage tree ordinance changes
I support the increased fines for heritage tree removal described here: http://www.almanacnews.com/news/2014/12/17/tonight-changes-to-menlo-parks-heritage-tree-ordinance.

However, the city also needs to improve transparency into this process. The information on tree removal approvals on the city website is from 2013. http://www.menlopark.org/DocumentCenter/View/836 . How many applications are rejected? Given the number of recent rebuilds where the lot has been scraped to bare dirt, I can only assume that the city is rubber-stamping applications.



Received on Thu Dec 18 2014 - 08:58:55 PST

[ Search ] [ By Date ] [ By Message ] [ By Subject ] [ By Author ]


Email communications sent to the City Council are public records. This site is an archive of emails received by the City Council at its city.council_at_(domainremoved)