Logo


Menlo Park City Council Email Log

[ Home ] [ City Council ] [ Search ] [ 05/06 Archive ] [ 07/08 Archive ] [ 09/10 Archive ] [ 2011 Archive ] [ 12/13 Archive ] [ Watch City Council Meetings ]


Almanac - Town Square re Downtown Parking

From: domainremoved <>
Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2014 20:14:16 -0500

Hi,
 
I'm so pleased the Almanac decided to open up the Downtown Parking - Town
Square posting.
Allow me to express my heartfelt thanks.
 
Many new postings have since been made, fortunately in a civil and
thoughtful way, with nearly 1,100 viewers, and counting.
 
I hope the City Staff and City Council are paying attention. Three
postings were made already to the City Council email log, which is encouraging. I
suspect there will be more following the first of the year.
 
With this type of community conversation, potential projects can be
thoughtfully considered that best meets both the needs of the merchants and the
community.
 
Happy Holidays

  
____________________________________
 From: _webmaster_at_(domainremoved)
Sent: 12/15/2014 4:51:57 P.M. Pacific Standard Time
Subj: New comment in Town Square


http://almanacnews.com/square/index.php?i=3&t=10787
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
 
 
Downtown Parking - More Needs To Be Done
Original post made by Christmas Shopper, Menlo Park: Downtown, on Dec 1,
2014
 
 
 





Nearly daily, one hears about what OTHER cities are doing about parking.
For instance, in today's paper an article appeared about an innovative type
parking garage proposed in the city of San Mateo. Both Palo Alto to the
south and Redwood City to the north are actively reviewing alternatives.

What is Menlo Park doing? If I recall, three years ago, in 2011, the topic
was considered and then it was STUDIED again early this year.

In the meantime, ticket after ticket is being issued, both for overnight
parking in one and two hour zones along with being 6" or more over a white
line.

Can anything else be done, such as 1) building a parking garage, much like
just about everyone else has done(except for Menlo Park), extending the
two hour parking to THREE HOUR parking (much like we now have during the
RELAXED holiday season parking period, and so on.

It seems like we have more questions than answers. Perhaps the 2015 City
Council will take a look at this and if not, well..... life goes on.

Comments (36)
 
 
_+ _ (javascript:showWhy('/square/comment_like.php?ci=81125&l=1',
'comment_like_81125')) 1 person likes this

Posted by 2015 City Council
a resident of Menlo Park: Central Menlo Park
on Dec 1, 2014 at 9:23 pm
With Cat Carlton's leadership as Mayor we will be in good hands.
_Report Objectionable Content_
(javascript:showWhy('/square/abuse.php?w=1&ci=81125', 'abuse_81125'))
_Email Town Square Moderator_
(http://almanacnews.com/about/contact/mailto.php?e=ts_moderator)



 
_+ _ (javascript:showWhy('/square/comment_like.php?ci=81199&l=3',
'comment_like_81199')) 3 people like this

Posted by Downtown Shopper
a resident of Menlo Park: Downtown
on Dec 4, 2014 at 12:24 pm
I love the three hour parking in effect during the holidays. Any chance the
 city would consider this year round?
_Report Objectionable Content_
(javascript:showWhy('/square/abuse.php?w=1&ci=81199', 'abuse_81199'))
_Email Town Square Moderator_
(http://almanacnews.com/about/contact/mailto.php?e=ts_moderator)



 
_+ _ (javascript:showWhy('/square/comment_like.php?ci=81214&l=1',
'comment_like_81214')) 1 person likes this

Posted by Peter Carpenter
a resident of Atherton: Lindenwood
on Dec 5, 2014 at 9:10 am
Peter Carpenter is a registered user.
There are lots of examples of what Menlo Park COULD do if it has the will
and the courage to think in terms of a long term solution.

First, SF's Union Sq garage is a great example of a public-private
partnership. In the 1930s, the Union Square Garage Corporation was formed and
lobbied for permission to build the world's first underground parking
structure.

"The idea of a private corporation leasing public land underneath a city
park was also new. Because of this, Union Square became a test case before
the California State Supreme Court, which ruled in City of San Francisco v.
Linares, that the City of San Francisco had the right to lease the
subsurface area to the Union Square Garage Corporation provided that the park
proper was not destroyed."

"After a California Supreme Court decision, permission was granted and
they broke ground on May 31, 1941."

If you look at the plaque at the Geary Street entrance to the garage you
will see the names of the businessmen who led the Union Square Garage
Corporation - I am proud that my grandfather, Russell Carpenter, was one of them.

Second, here is another more recent and automated underground garage:

_Web Link_
(http://www.roadtraffic-technology.com/projects/munich-automated-underground-parking/)

"Design of the facility started in January 2004 with construction starting
in October 2004. The construction was completed by February 2006
(roadworks took ten months and the entire project 16 months from the start of
construction). The investment for the project was €11.35m (45% on building, 30%
on the parking system and 25% on other costs).

The parking system provided is a combination of two Wöhr Multipark 740
Systems which will provide 284 parking places (150 plus 134). "

Third, here is a 700 space underground garage AND surface park in Brooklyn:

"After renewing efforts three years ago, the city has finally struck a
deal with the Willoughby Operating Company for the joint park and garage
project. The Willoughby Operating Company, an affiliate of the American
Development Group, will lease the city-owned land. It will use $6 million from city
capital, the city's Economic Development Corporation and private
contributions from surrounding developers to construct the park.

The Willoughby Operating Company has also agreed to pay for any cost
overruns and to finance the excavation and development of the garage. It hired
Automotion Parking Systems, which has a principal in common with the
American Development Group, to build and run the garage."


_Web Link_
(http://www.nytimes.com/2013/07/10/realestate/commercial/underground-garage-to-help-pay-for-new-park-in-brooklyn.html?ref=nyregion&_r=1) &

The only thing stopping Menlo Park from doing something equally attractive
and exciting is a lack of imagination.

One would think that Menlo Park in Silicon Valley in 2014 could catch up
with what was done in San Fransisco in 1941, Munich in 2004 and in 2013 in
Brooklyn.
_Report Objectionable Content_
(javascript:showWhy('/square/abuse.php?w=1&ci=81214', 'abuse_81214'))
_Email Town Square Moderator_
(http://almanacnews.com/about/contact/mailto.php?e=ts_moderator)



 
_+ _ (javascript:showWhy('/square/comment_like.php?ci=81215&l=4',
'comment_like_81215')) 4 people like this

Posted by Peter Carpenter
a resident of Atherton: Lindenwood
on Dec 5, 2014 at 9:15 am
Peter Carpenter is a registered user.
Posted by Peter Carpenter
a resident of Atherton: Lindenwood
on Jul 23, 2014 at 7:09 pm
Peter Carpenter is a registered user.
I suggest taking the two existing surface parking lots between Santa Cruz
and Menlo and Evelyn and Chestnut and building an underground garage
covering that entire area including under Crane. The entire surface area would be
repurposed as a pedestrian and bicycle park/plaza including an area for
activities like the farmers' market. An automated garage covering that area
could easily accommodate 5 times or more cars than the existing lots
provide. The park/plaza would encourage existing Santa Cruz businesses to open out
to the park/plaza.

An RFP outlining the concept would, I predict, produce some exciting
development proposals that would minimize the cost to the city in exchange for a
lease to the subterranean rights.
_Report Objectionable Content_
(javascript:showWhy('/square/abuse.php?w=1&ci=81215', 'abuse_81215'))
_Email Town Square Moderator_ (http://almanacnews.com/about/contact/mail
to.php?e=ts_moderator)



 
_+ _ (javascript:showWhy('/square/comment_like.php?ci=81222&l=1',
'comment_like_81222')) 1 person likes this

Posted by dana hendrickson
a resident of Menlo Park: Central Menlo Park
on Dec 5, 2014 at 12:41 pm
Great idea, Peter. More parking PLUS a beautifully landscaped central park
available for multiple uses like the farmer's market, outside concerts and
plays, "off-street" fairs, and evening strolls would be wonderful
additions. A park with plenty of convenient nearby parking could become a
centerpiece that would generate a great deal of pride in downtown Menlo Park. Let's
get started!
_Report Objectionable Content_
(javascript:showWhy('/square/abuse.php?w=1&ci=81222', 'abuse_81222'))
_Email Town Square Moderator_
(http://almanacnews.com/about/contact/mailto.php?e=ts_moderator)



 
_+ _ (javascript:showWhy('/square/comment_like.php?ci=81224&l=2',
'comment_like_81224')) 2 people like this

Posted by Peter Carpenter
a resident of Atherton: Lindenwood
on Dec 5, 2014 at 12:58 pm
Peter Carpenter is a registered user.
" Let's get started!"

Just like the SF business leaders in the 1930's created a private entity
to build the Union Square Garage we should create a similar entity for Menlo
Park.

How about MPDB = More Parking Down Below.
_Report Objectionable Content_
(javascript:showWhy('/square/abuse.php?w=1&ci=81224', 'abuse_81224'))
_Email Town Square Moderator_
(http://almanacnews.com/about/contact/mailto.php?e=ts_moderator)



 
_+ _ (javascript:showWhy('/square/comment_like.php?ci=81226&l=0',
'comment_like_81226')) Like this comment

Posted by Downtown Shopper
a resident of Menlo Park: Downtown
on Dec 5, 2014 at 1:30 pm
Keep in mind that Menlo Park

1) Does not have a Downtown Merchants Association,

2) Does not have a Business Improvement District (BID), and

3) Does not have a City Staff committed to building a garage.

Just what it will take to provide more parking downtown is a mystery.
Without someone eagerly carrying the ball and following through until its
fruition makes this entire thread entertaining, but not going anywhere.

Being realistic, downtown parking is now nearly at capacity. With the
construcdtion of new properties on El Camino Real and other locations in town,
will only exacerbate the problem. Planning ahead is essential.

"If we build it, they will come".
_Report Objectionable Content_
(javascript:showWhy('/square/abuse.php?w=1&ci=81226', 'abuse_81226'))
_Email Town Square Moderator_
(http://almanacnews.com/about/contact/mailto.php?e=ts_moderator)



 
_+ _ (javascript:showWhy('/square/comment_like.php?ci=81228&l=1',
'comment_like_81228')) 1 person likes this

Posted by Peter Carpenter
a resident of Atherton: Lindenwood
on Dec 5, 2014 at 1:34 pm
Peter Carpenter is a registered user.
The ONLY thing stopping an underground parking project in Menlo Park is the
 lack of courage.

Here is how the SF Union Square garage "happened":

"THE UNION SQUARE GARAGE

The idea of a garage under Union Square was first proposed in 1910 by W P,
Fennimore, president and founder of the Downtown Association. Such a
scheme was quite novel, and in 1922 and 1928, charter amendments to permit
sub-surface use of public parks for automobile parking were defeated by the
electorate. But in 1930, an amendment was finally passed.16

Because of downtown development and the increasing use of automobiles, the
streets surrounding Union Square were becoming greatly congested, and
there was an acute parking shortage. By 1940, for example, within the city's
"Triangle District," an area between Market and Sutter streets, there were
concentrated 17 large retail stores, 11 office buildings, 88 hotels, 15
clubs, and 7 theaters. The capacity of nearby garages could scarcely serve the
patrons of a single store. Local merchants became concerned that they would
lose business to outlying suburbs if something were not done about the
parking problem.

Thus the Union Square Garage Corporation was formed in 1938 for the
purpose of building an underground garage in Union Square. Such a feat had never
been undertaken before, and three years of research were required before
construction could begin.

The idea of a private corporation leasing public land underneath a city
park was also new. Because of this, Union Square became a test case before
the California State Supreme Court, which ruled in City of San Francisco v.
Linares, that the City of San Francisco had the right to lease the
subsurface area to the Union Square Garage Corporation provided that the park proper
was not destroyed.

Work then proceeded with Timothy Pfleuger as architect and McDonald and
Kahn as general contractors. No public funds were used, rather, financing was
by stock subscription amounting to $850,000, mostly from local property
owners and a Reconstruction Finance Corporation loan of $650,000.

Ground was broken on March 31, 1941, and the entire block bounded by
Geary, Stockton, Post, and Powell streets was soon excavated to an average depth
of 48 feet. Steel piles were driven into the ground for bulkheading and
160 massive columns were put in place to support four levels, including the
garage roof surface.

The Dewey Monument, which weighed 350 tons, demanded special treatment,
not only to move it to make way for construction and excavation, but to
strengthen it against further earthquakes. The monument's granite cylinders,
which were slightly askew from the earthquake of 1906, were hollowed out and
fitted over a core of reinforced concrete that extends all the way down to
the foundation of the garage.19

At full capacity, the garage housed 1,700 automobiles. Additionally, most
of the space on the top floor was reserved for waiting rooms, restrooms,
offices, a sales room for accessories, and an area for servicing cars. The
garage became an immediate success and 766,000 automobiles were parked there
in the first year of operation.

Fortunately, the garage was never used for another purpose for which it
was designed: as a bomb shelter. The garage was well under way when on
December 7, 1941 Pearl Harbor was attacked, and the United States entered the
Second World War. It was only because of its alternate use as a bomb shelter
or as an emergency hospital that special materials were released for the
building's completion.

By the summer of 1942, the world's first multilevel underground garage was
finished. Mayor Angelo Rossi presided over the dedication ceremonies on
September 12, 1942. The Dewey Monument was also rededicated on October 25,
1942 as part of the San Francisco Navy Day celebration.

THE ROOFTOP PARK

In conjunction with the garage's architect, Timothy Pfleuger, a landscape
plan for the garage rooftop was designed by the Division of Engineering and
Landscape Design of the City of San Francisco, whose superintendent was
John McLaren. The park was the first in the world situated above a
multi-level garage. A preliminary design completed in 1940 called for a large central
pill-shaped plaza to contain the Dewey Monument. Two paths would run
north-south, skirting the main garage entry, and on the east and west ends of
the Square paths would connect to the street corners and run at mid-block.
Along each path were to be several grassy areas. The central plaza was to be
surrounded by planter boxes containing Irish yew trees."
******
Why not here, why not now?
_Report Objectionable Content_
(javascript:showWhy('/square/abuse.php?w=1&ci=81228', 'abuse_81228'))
_Email Town Square Moderator_
(http://almanacnews.com/about/contact/mailto.php?e=ts_moderator)



 
_+ _ (javascript:showWhy('/square/comment_like.php?ci=81229&l=0',
'comment_like_81229')) Like this comment

Posted by Downtown Shopper
a resident of Menlo Park: Downtown
on Dec 5, 2014 at 1:46 pm
Let's leave a lack of courage to fairy tales, such as the Wizard of Oz
(remember the lion)?

Peter, what we need is leadership, tenacity, passion and committment.
Years ago local downtown property owner and former President of the Chamber of
Commerce, Albert Giannotti, a well respected "elder" in the community, wise
and successful, tried his level best to get a garage built. He obtained
bids, plans and a great deal of support, but in the end - zippo.

My hunch is, the city's plan is to hope that an El Camino Real developer
will come along and offer to build a Downtown Garage at little or no expense
to the city as a "public benefit" in exchange for an additional floor, or
more apartment or condo units or some other concession.

What this does magically, is eliminate the bickering between store owners
on who pays for what in a fair and impartial way and presto, it's done. No
bond, no loans, funding is provided by others.

What we can't do for ourselves, due to lack of "courage" or other
characteristics, is RESCUED by an outsider. This approach has worked in other
cities.
_Report Objectionable Content_
(javascript:showWhy('/square/abuse.php?w=1&ci=81229', 'abuse_81229'))
_Email Town Square Moderator_
(http://almanacnews.com/about/contact/mailto.php?e=ts_moderator)



 
_+ _ (javascript:showWhy('/square/comment_like.php?ci=81230&l=1',
'comment_like_81230')) 1 person likes this

Posted by Peter Carpenter
a resident of Atherton: Lindenwood
on Dec 5, 2014 at 2:08 pm
Peter Carpenter is a registered user.
"My hunch is, the city's plan is to hope that an El Camino Real developer
will come along and offer to build a Downtown Garage at little or no expense
to the city as a "public benefit" in exchange for an additional floor, or
more apartment or condo units or some other concession"

That won't happen- there is no Santa Claus on Santa Cruz and the ECR
projects would not benefit from a downtown garage.

Downtown Shopper can wring his/her hands all they want but hand wringing
is not a solution.

All that is lacking is the courage to make it happen - SF CITIZENS made it
happen at Union Square over 70 years ago. What is stopping the CITIZENS of
Menlo Park from doing the same?
_Report Objectionable Content_
(javascript:showWhy('/square/abuse.php?w=1&ci=81230', 'abuse_81230'))
_Email Town Square Moderator_
(http://almanacnews.com/about/contact/mailto.php?e=ts_moderator)



 
_+ _ (javascript:showWhy('/square/comment_like.php?ci=81233&l=0',
'comment_like_81233')) Like this comment

Posted by member
a resident of Menlo Park: Downtown
on Dec 5, 2014 at 4:23 pm
Since the real issue is improving access to the downtown area, instead of
focusing on just expanding parking an alternative approach could be to focus
on putting together some sort of improved mass transit system. Properly
implemented, this would have the added benefit of reducing traffic in the
region (which was a major recent discussion surrounding proposition M).

While I am not a traffic engineer, I would expect the city could purchase
and operate a large number of shuttles for significantly less than the cost
of building an underground garage.
_Report Objectionable Content_
(javascript:showWhy('/square/abuse.php?w=1&ci=81233', 'abuse_81233'))
_Email Town Square Moderator_
(http://almanacnews.com/about/contact/mailto.php?e=ts_moderator)



 
_+ _ (javascript:showWhy('/square/comment_like.php?ci=81234&l=0',
'comment_like_81234')) Like this comment

Posted by Bob McGrew
a resident of Menlo Park: The Willows
on Dec 5, 2014 at 5:25 pm
It does seem like downtown parking is at capacity. In other places, I'd be
sympathetic to improving mass transit, but downtown Menlo just doesn't get
enough visitors to make mass transit feasible. I would support a parking
garage, although I would think a two-story garage would have a lot of benefit
at a very modest cost compared to an underground garage.

I would very much like to see a more lively downtown, with more
restaurants and shops, and some housing up above. A lot of the spaces seem to be
perpetually vacant - probably because the whole area is so sleepy and doesn't
get any foot traffic from offices or housing.

What would it take to make that happen?
_Report Objectionable Content_
(javascript:showWhy('/square/abuse.php?w=1&ci=81234', 'abuse_81234'))
_Email Town Square Moderator_
(http://almanacnews.com/about/contact/mailto.php?e=ts_moderator)



 
_+ _ (javascript:showWhy('/square/comment_like.php?ci=81235&l=1',
'comment_like_81235')) 1 person likes this

Posted by Menlo Voter
a resident of Menlo Park: other
on Dec 5, 2014 at 7:51 pm
Menlo Voter is a registered user.
We seem to consistently vote in bond issues for a lot more money for
schools. A bond issue for a parking garage, even subterranean, would be modest in
 comparison.
_Report Objectionable Content_
(javascript:showWhy('/square/abuse.php?w=1&ci=81235', 'abuse_81235'))
_Email Town Square Moderator_
(http://almanacnews.com/about/contact/mailto.php?e=ts_moderator)



 
_+ _ (javascript:showWhy('/square/comment_like.php?ci=81236&l=1',
'comment_like_81236')) 1 person likes this

Posted by Peter Carpenter
a resident of Atherton: Lindenwood
on Dec 5, 2014 at 9:43 pm
Peter Carpenter is a registered user.
Please read the prior postings - an underground garage built and leased by
a private company would cost the City of Menlo Park very little. Let's do
some creative thinking rather than just more negativity.

here is a 700 space underground garage AND surface park in Brooklyn:

"After renewing efforts three years ago, the city has finally struck a
deal with the Willoughby Operating Company for the joint park and garage
project. The Willoughby Operating Company, an affiliate of the American
Development Group, will lease the city-owned land. It will use $6 million from city
capital, the city's Economic Development Corporation and private
contributions from surrounding developers to construct the park.

The Willoughby Operating Company has also agreed to pay for any cost
overruns and to finance the excavation and development of the garage. It hired
Automotion Parking Systems, which has a principal in common with the
American Development Group, to build and run the garage."
_Report Objectionable Content_
(javascript:showWhy('/square/abuse.php?w=1&ci=81236', 'abuse_81236'))
_Email Town Square Moderator_
(http://almanacnews.com/about/contact/mailto.php?e=ts_moderator)



 
_+ _ (javascript:showWhy('/square/comment_like.php?ci=81243&l=0',
'comment_like_81243')) Like this comment

Posted by Downtown Shopper
a resident of Menlo Park: Downtown
on Dec 6, 2014 at 4:55 pm
Peter, save your breath. The City is not listening. City STAFF have told me
 that they are not going to spend good money on a problem that doesn't
exist. CITY COUNCIL members have told me that they don't read this column - as
there are too many off the wall, bazaar comments. This may be a good column
to vent, but change occurs in other ways.

Where are the decisions made? Who makes them? How does one get this topic
center stage and on the agenda? Who pays for the solution? If not now, when?

The MAYOR likes low hanging fruit that can be implimented quick and
easily. This may help short term problems but doesn't hold a candle to a long
term solution.

I suspect if more people spoke during a City Council meeting directly to
the decision and policy makers during PUBLIC COMMENT NO 1 OR NO 2, the topic
may get some attention. In the meantime, go ahead and vent if it makes you
feel better.
_Report Objectionable Content_
(javascript:showWhy('/square/abuse.php?w=1&ci=81243', 'abuse_81243'))
_Email Town Square Moderator_
(http://almanacnews.com/about/contact/mailto.php?e=ts_moderator)



 
_+ _ (javascript:showWhy('/square/comment_like.php?ci=81244&l=1',
'comment_like_81244')) 1 person likes this

Posted by Peter Carpenter
a resident of Atherton: Lindenwood
on Dec 6, 2014 at 5:10 pm
Peter Carpenter is a registered user.
I continue to share my views with each of the Council members and with a
carefully selected circle of influential citizens.

The critical issue is do enough citizens care?

If not, then the neglect and decay will continue. That is both the
strength and weakness of a democracy.

So if no one speaks out then nothing will happen.
_Report Objectionable Content_
(javascript:showWhy('/square/abuse.php?w=1&ci=81244', 'abuse_81244'))
_Email Town Square Moderator_
(http://almanacnews.com/about/contact/mailto.php?e=ts_moderator)



 
_+ _ (javascript:showWhy('/square/comment_like.php?ci=81250&l=4',
'comment_like_81250')) 4 people like this

Posted by Downtowner
a resident of Menlo Park: other
on Dec 6, 2014 at 7:40 pm
[part removed.]
This is all politics now. Try to create a constant stream of negativity on
anything. No support to back it up. No ideas. Just criticism. Ignore the
improvements to Downtown. Ignore the City Council just went through an
election completely focused on the long term of downtown. downtown shopper
thinks somehow at the same time the council should have floated a bond for
parking garages? Really? I don't think so. I think the criticism is actually a
charade to must criticize and it's the only thing they can come up.
Pathetic.
_Report Objectionable Content_
(javascript:showWhy('/square/abuse.php?w=1&ci=81250', 'abuse_81250'))
_Email Town Square Moderator_
(http://almanacnews.com/about/contact/mailto.php?e=ts_moderator)



 
_+ _ (javascript:showWhy('/square/comment_like.php?ci=81252&l=4',
'comment_like_81252')) 4 people like this

Posted by Downtowner
a resident of Menlo Park: other
on Dec 6, 2014 at 8:06 pm
Downtown Shopper, explain how you think it was possible for any member of
the City Council to float a parking garage bond last year, just after two
school districts floated bonds, while the high school district was floating a
bond, and while in the middle of fighting off Measure M.

The low hanging fruit comment is laughable. Everyone who paid attention
watched multiple long standing issues addressed in the City last year.

You obviously have a political agenda behind your comments. Whether it be
to criticize the Mayor and Council or just to complain to get your way,
mischaracterizing the past in order to do so doesn't fool anyone.
_Report Objectionable Content_
(javascript:showWhy('/square/abuse.php?w=1&ci=81252', 'abuse_81252'))
_Email Town Square Moderator_
(http://almanacnews.com/about/contact/mailto.php?e=ts_moderator)



 
_+ _ (javascript:showWhy('/square/comment_like.php?ci=81261&l=1',
'comment_like_81261')) 1 person likes this

Posted by Peter Carpenter
a resident of Atherton: Lindenwood
on Dec 7, 2014 at 11:49 am
Peter Carpenter is a registered user.
My proposed solution would NOT require a city bond measure. Note that both
the Union Square and Willoughby Park underground parking structures were
built by private corporations who leased the subterranean rights from the
city.

This is a win-win. The city leases the subterranean rights and gets a huge
capacity parking garage for free and then still has the surface rights for
a park/pedestrian mall, farmers' market etc.
_Report Objectionable Content_
(javascript:showWhy('/square/abuse.php?w=1&ci=81261', 'abuse_81261'))
_Email Town Square Moderator_
(http://almanacnews.com/about/contact/mailto.php?e=ts_moderator)



 
_+ _ (javascript:showWhy('/square/comment_like.php?ci=81262&l=0',
'comment_like_81262')) Like this comment

Posted by mkeenly
a resident of Menlo Park: Allied Arts/Stanford Park
on Dec 7, 2014 at 12:32 pm
mkeenly is a registered user.
This is a solution looking for a problem. Creative parking management
schemes are inexpensive and can maintain parking availability.
_Report Objectionable Content_
(javascript:showWhy('/square/abuse.php?w=1&ci=81262', 'abuse_81262'))
_Email Town Square Moderator_
(http://almanacnews.com/about/contact/mailto.php?e=ts_moderator)



 
_+ _ (javascript:showWhy('/square/comment_like.php?ci=81263&l=2',
'comment_like_81263')) 2 people like this

Posted by Peter Carpenter
a resident of Atherton: Lindenwood
on Dec 7, 2014 at 2:41 pm
Peter Carpenter is a registered user.
This is not "a solution looking for a problem." The parking problem has
been carefully analyzed and a solution identified.

Figure D-6 and the associated language in the Specific Plan clearly
support the City intention to build multi-level parking garages.

"Parking Garages
Due to their size, above ground parking garages are highly
visible and affect the character of the surrounding area.
Guidelines for parking garages help minimize their visual
impact and integrate them into the surrounding area.
Standards
E.3.7.09 To promote the use of bicycles, secure bicycle
parking shall be provided at the street level of public parking
garages. Bicycle parking is also discussed in more detail in
Section F.5 "Bicycle Storage Standards and Guidelines."
Guidelines
E.3.7.10 Parking garages on downtown parking plazas
should avoid monolithic massing by employing change in
façade rhythm, materials and/or color.
E.3.7.11 To minimize or eliminate their visibility and impact
from the street and other signifi cant public spaces, parking
garages should be underground, wrapped by other uses
(i.e. parking podium within a development) and/or screened
from view through architectural and/or landscape treatment.
E.3.7.12 Whether free-standing or incorporated into overall
building design, garage façades should be designed with
a modulated system of vertical openings and pilasters,
with design attention to an overall building façade that fi ts
comfortably and compatibly into the pattern, articulation,
scale and massing of surrounding building character.
E.3.7.13 Shared parking is encouraged where feasible to
minimize space needs, and it is effectively codifi ed through
the plan's off-street parking standards and allowance for
shared parking studies.
E.3.7.14 A parking garage roof should be approached
as a usable surface and an opportunity for sustainable
strategies, such as installment of a green roof, solar panels
or other measures that minimize the heat island effect."

Some posters seem not to have read the Specific Plan.
_Report Objectionable Content_
(javascript:showWhy('/square/abuse.php?w=1&ci=81263', 'abuse_81263'))
_Email Town Square Moderator_
(http://almanacnews.com/about/contact/mailto.php?e=ts_moderator)



 
_+ _ (javascript:showWhy('/square/comment_like.php?ci=81316&l=1',
'comment_like_81316')) 1 person likes this

Posted by Downtown Shopper
a resident of Menlo Park: Downtown
on Dec 10, 2014 at 5:08 pm
The idea of providing parking in downtown Menlo Park that Peter Carpenter
has suggested has a lot of merit and may be worth taking a serious look at.
Leasing the land to an experienced company that has built parking garages
for other cities, may make a lot of sense locally. There may not be any cost
to the city, and in fact, they may be able to charge rent to lease the
land, thus making money. At the same time, additional parking places would be
available to merchants, their employees, office building tenants and
perhaps most importantly, shoppers, consumers, restaurant patrons and others
making downtown Menlo Park a destination, as opposed to the 1,000 of cars that
simply pass through on their way to somewhere else, such as Stanford
Shopping Center, Town and Country Shopping Center and downtown Palo Alto.
_Report Objectionable Content_
(javascript:showWhy('/square/abuse.php?w=1&ci=81316', 'abuse_81316'))
_Email Town Square Moderator_
(http://almanacnews.com/about/contact/mailto.php?e=ts_moderator)



 
_+ _ (javascript:showWhy('/square/comment_like.php?ci=81338&l=2',
'comment_like_81338')) 2 people like this

Posted by Sam Sinnott
a resident of Menlo Park: Downtown
on Dec 11, 2014 at 1:22 pm
Last night I addressed the Transportation Commission on this very subject
as a public comment. How do we build all three of the parking garages
identified in the specific plan on the public lots? My goal is to try to get the
TC to take the lead in planning these projects. The traffic downtown is a
serious safety problem created mostly by the street parking.

Without the construction of these garages street parking cannot be
reduced.

The specific plan incorporates a vision of the downtown that is bicycle
and pedestrian friendly with wider sidewalks. This vision will never be
realized without the parking garages and elimination of most of the street
parking.

The Pearl Street Mall in Boulder, Co. is now a destination walking street
that was once a tired old downtown. The retailers there now do incredibly
well. Santa Cruz Avenue does not need to remove through traffic, just most
of the street parking to also experience a Renaissance.

Pearl Street has 5 parking garages within two blocks of the walking mall.
_Report Objectionable Content_
(javascript:showWhy('/square/abuse.php?w=1&ci=81338', 'abuse_81338'))
_Email Town Square Moderator_ (
http://almanacnews.com/about/contact/mailto.php?e=ts_moderator)



 
_+ _ (javascript:showWhy('/square/comment_like.php?ci=81341&l=1',
'comment_like_81341')) 1 person likes this

Posted by Menlo Voter
a resident of Menlo Park: other
on Dec 11, 2014 at 2:54 pm
Menlo Voter is a registered user.
Pearl Street Mall is a great example of what came happen with some
visionary thinking and some creativity in funding. Of course, the Pearl Street Mall
 doesn't really have a "village character," so I'm sure a bunch a folks
would be up in arms if we try it here. Having a private company build and
operate parking garages would be a boon for MP and would allow the elimination
of street parking as Sam notes. Of course the city would probably lose a
sizable chunk of income due to decreased parking fines, but I'm sure they can
stick a few more red light cameras in to make up for it.
_Report Objectionable Content_
(javascript:showWhy('/square/abuse.php?w=1&ci=81341', 'abuse_81341'))
_Email Town Square Moderator_
(http://almanacnews.com/about/contact/mailto.php?e=ts_moderator)



 
_+ _ (javascript:showWhy('/square/comment_like.php?ci=81351&l=2',
'comment_like_81351')) 2 people like this

Posted by Ernst Meisner
a resident of Menlo Park: Downtown
on Dec 11, 2014 at 7:22 pm
_at_(domainremoved)
 planning these projects. And, Santa Cruz Avenue does not need to remove
through traffic, just most of the street parking to also experience a
Renaissance.
1)
I agree with Sam's goal of having a commission take the lead in creating
the three garages. I hope that the City Council will commit to getting this
accomplished as a matter of policy and by charging the TC or, if more
practical, an entirely new, special body with the task. This group would find
financing options, research legal issues, determine aesthetics, and physical
details and a host of other issues surfacing along the way. I would also
hope that Peter Carpenters suggestion of underground solutions would be
seriously considered.
Menlo Park demonstrated before that determination, commitment and
leadership can have positive results when it created the downtown group to
transform Santa Cruz Ave into a more attractive experience.
2)
I would like to modify Sam's idea of keeping Santa Cruz Ave open to
through traffic. It should only be accessible as needed for emergecny vehicles
and any deliveries should be restricted to nighttime hours. Daytime uses
should be pedestrian oriented.

During my trip to Germany this September I drove 3.500 KM visiting towns
and cities of ALL sizes. Practically all had found ways to preserve a core,
usually historically significant area, into a market place / shopping
district / pedestrian zone. These Zones have an abundance of flowers,
landscaping and comfortable street furniture and are within short distance of public
parking. This parking may be in form of open parking lots or structures of
many types. Some of them having very sophisticated systems of indicating at
entry how many open spaces available and in each aisle where the open
spaces are.

Nobody seems to think twice about walking a couple of blocks and we may
need to adjust our expectations of parking right in front of our various
destinations.

Let us create a pedestrian friendly, human scale, downtown Character with
attractive architecture. Forget the village label


_Report Objectionable Content_
(javascript:showWhy('/square/abuse.php?w=1&ci=81351', 'abuse_81351'))
_Email Town Square Moderator_
(http://almanacnews.com/about/contact/mailto.php?e=ts_moderator)



 
_+ _ (javascript:showWhy('/square/comment_like.php?ci=81355&l=0',
'comment_like_81355')) Like this comment

Posted by Colin Jenkins
a resident of Menlo Park: Downtown
on Dec 12, 2014 at 12:38 pm
I own Occasions, etc on SCA. The last I heard, maybe in 2006 or so, there
was an idea of building a parking garage behind Flegel's. MPPC was offering
to pay a portion in order that they be allowed to use it. The remainder was
to be paid for by assessing the merchants. My recollection is that it
would cost somewhere between $20K and $30K per parking space depending on what
was built. At the time, after doing some quick math, I concluded that we
would be out of business if the assessments were what I calculated them to
be. This particular idea died on the vine much to my relief. I don't think
many merchants here could survive the cost of paying for a parking garage

_Report Objectionable Content_
(javascript:showWhy('/square/abuse.php?w=1&ci=81355', 'abuse_81355'))
_Email Town Square Moderator_
(http://almanacnews.com/about/contact/mailto.php?e=ts_moderator)



 
_+ _ (javascript:showWhy('/square/comment_like.php?ci=81358&l=2',
'comment_like_81358')) 2 people like this

Posted by Robert Cronin
a resident of Menlo Park: The Willows
on Dec 12, 2014 at 1:05 pm
Does anybody who doesn't live in Menlo Park, shop in Menlo Park? Menlo Park
 is tiny. No resident lives more than three miles from downtown. If you
think parking is a problem, get on your bike. That's what I do. It's easy. You
can do it.
_Report Objectionable Content_
(javascript:showWhy('/square/abuse.php?w=1&ci=81358', 'abuse_81358'))
_Email Town Square Moderator_
(http://almanacnews.com/about/contact/mailto.php?e=ts_moderator)



 
_+ _ (javascript:showWhy('/square/comment_like.php?ci=81359&l=0',
'comment_like_81359')) Like this comment

Posted by Peter Carpenter
a resident of Atherton: Lindenwood
on Dec 12, 2014 at 1:37 pm
Peter Carpenter is a registered user.
What downtown merchants need is more customers not more assessments.

We need to find a way to build an exciting and dramatic parking facility
that pays for itself. Other communities have done this, there is no reason
that Menlo park can't do the same.
_Report Objectionable Content_
(javascript:showWhy('/square/abuse.php?w=1&ci=81359', 'abuse_81359'))
_Email Town Square Moderator_
(http://almanacnews.com/about/contact/mailto.php?e=ts_moderator)



 
_+ _ (javascript:showWhy('/square/comment_like.php?ci=81360&l=0',
'comment_like_81360')) Like this comment

Posted by Peter Carpenter
a resident of Atherton: Lindenwood
on Dec 12, 2014 at 1:47 pm
Peter Carpenter is a registered user.
Here is an update on the Willoughby Square Park and Robot Parking Garage:

_Web Link_
(http://buildabetterburb.org/willoughby-square-park-above-parking-below/)

They have done all the hard work of thinking this through and running the
numbers - why not ask them how and why they are doing this?
_Report Objectionable Content_
(javascript:showWhy('/square/abuse.php?w=1&ci=81360', 'abuse_81360'))
_Email Town Square Moderator_
(http://almanacnews.com/about/contact/mailto.php?e=ts_moderator)



 
_+ _ (javascript:showWhy('/square/comment_like.php?ci=81365&l=0',
'comment_like_81365')) Like this comment

Posted by (The original) Downtowner
a resident of Menlo Park: Central Menlo Park
on Dec 12, 2014 at 5:49 pm
I'm puzzled - how many more restaurants does downtown MP need? Every block
has at least 1; some have 3 or more. For retail, how big a draw are rug
shops? How many people come to town just to visit a spice store? I buy my
spices at a grocery store. When MPPC raised the rent prohibitively on the
family-run hardware store which had served the community well for 40 years, we
were left without a much needed local source. Much later, another proprietor
thankfully stepped in to rent a very small space to fill the most pressing
 needs.

Not everyone can bike 3 miles to town. Not all of us find what we want or
need when we get there. The economic base of this town has changed greatly.
People who buy 3-4 million dollars for homes now usually hire designers to
furnish them instead of buying a new sofa at the local furniture store. How
 many people actually want to develop film now? We don't go downtown to buy
new refrigerators as we did 30 years ago. Burlingame Ave has an Apple
store, J Crew, etc. Menlo has prided itself on not having "chain" stores but
people who come to town for those stores actually patronize other
establishments too.

Maybe we don't need more parking or nail salons. How about a determined
effort to attract a popular retailer not already represented at Stanford
Shopping Center? Then additional parking will be needed.
_Report Objectionable Content_
(javascript:showWhy('/square/abuse.php?w=1&ci=81365', 'abuse_81365'))
_Email Town Square Moderator_
(http://almanacnews.com/about/contact/mailto.php?e=ts_moderator)



 
_+ _ (javascript:showWhy('/square/comment_like.php?ci=81366&l=0',
'comment_like_81366')) Like this comment

Posted by Peter Carpenter
a resident of Atherton: Lindenwood
on Dec 12, 2014 at 6:07 pm
Peter Carpenter is a registered user.
"How about a determined effort to attract a popular retailer not already
represented at Stanford Shopping Center? "

They will demand customers - no customers then no new businesses.

The Specific Plan provides for a big increase in customers for the
downtown via the now vacant ECR sites.

And customers will demand better parking.
_Report Objectionable Content_
(javascript:showWhy('/square/abuse.php?w=1&ci=81366', 'abuse_81366'))
_Email Town Square Moderator_
(http://almanacnews.com/about/contact/mailto.php?e=ts_moderator)



 
_+ _ (javascript:showWhy('/square/comment_like.php?ci=81394&l=2',
'comment_like_81394')) 2 people like this

Posted by Nikki Stitt Sokol
a resident of Menlo Park: University Heights
on Dec 14, 2014 at 4:39 pm
I am delighted to see people here bringing up the Pearl Street Mall in
Boulder. I grew up in Boulder but have lived here for almost 10 years. Menlo
Park would be vastly improved by closing Santa Cruz Ave to cars and creating
a pedestrian mall area similar to Boulder's. Foot traffic would increase as
the area became an attractive place for gathering. Many families would
support attractive, preferably underground parking garages in order to have a
pedestrian area that would be filled with better shops, cafés, and
restaurants. Menlo Park needs a great vision - and this is one. Let's do it!
_Report Objectionable Content_
(javascript:showWhy('/square/abuse.php?w=1&ci=81394', 'abuse_81394'))
_Email Town Square Moderator_
(http://almanacnews.com/about/contact/mailto.php?e=ts_moderator)



 
_+ _ (javascript:showWhy('/square/comment_like.php?ci=81419&l=1',
'comment_like_81419')) 1 person likes this

Posted by Sam Sinnott
a resident of Menlo Park: Downtown
1 hour ago
Good comments all. In response to Colin Jenkins - you are right. Different
parking garage plans and funding options have been around for years. Most
using an assessment district concept based on the assumption that the
property owners benefiting most from the structures should pay for them. Due to
the scale of these projects the burden quickly gets enormous on the few
downtown property owners. 30 years ago an assessment district for the garages
actually went to a vote and was defeated.

The best approach, in my humble opinion, is a city wide municipal bond for
all 3 structures. Of course I have zero experience in such matters but
conceptually it seems best to pool the cost city wide since we will all
benefit.

Once the garages are built and the cars are off the street we will have
many design options from slow through traffic to walking streets to create
the downtown renaissance Menlo Park deserves.
_Report Objectionable Content_
(javascript:showWhy('/square/abuse.php?w=1&ci=81419', 'abuse_81419'))
_Email Town Square Moderator_
(http://almanacnews.com/about/contact/mailto.php?e=ts_moderator)



 
_+ _ (javascript:showWhy('/square/comment_like.php?ci=81422&l=1',
'comment_like_81422')) 1 person likes this

Posted by Adina Levin
a resident of Menlo Park: Central Menlo Park
14 minutes ago
One of the secrets to the success of Boulder Pearl Street parking district
- they charged for parking, and they used the money to fund transit passes,
 shuttles, and other services to help reduce the need for even more
parking.

To Downtowner - true, not *everyone* can bicycle two or three miles. But
many people can. Improvements to bike safety and low-cost bike parking can
help more people make the trips by bike, and save he car parking for people
who need it.

Our downtown is pretty small, and there is plenty of car traffic - it
would be great if we could more help people get downtown without driving - so
the parking spaces would be available for people who really need it!
_Report Objectionable Content_
(javascript:showWhy('/square/abuse.php?w=1&ci=81422', 'abuse_81422'))
_Email Town Square Moderator_
(http://almanacnews.com/about/contact/mailto.php?e=ts_moderator)



 
_+ _ (javascript:showWhy('/square/comment_like.php?ci=81423&l=0',
'comment_like_81423')) Like this comment

Posted by Peter Carpenter
a resident of Atherton: Lindenwood
11 minutes ago
Peter Carpenter is a registered user.
"One of the secrets to the success of Boulder Pearl Street parking district
- they charged for parking, and they used the money to fund transit
passes, shuttles, and other services to help reduce the need for even more
parking. "

That is exactly what Stanford has been doing for over 25 years - and it
works. Not a penny of General Fund educational dollars is spent on building
parking structures, bike paths and running the shuttle service.
_Report Objectionable Content_
(javascript:showWhy('/square/abuse.php?w=1&ci=81423', 'abuse_81423'))
_Email Town Square Moderator_
(http://almanacnews.com/about/contact/mailto.php?e=ts_moderator)



 
_+ _ (javascript:showWhy('/square/comment_like.php?ci=81424&l=0',
'comment_like_81424')) Like this comment

Posted by Tunbridge Wells
a resident of Menlo Park: Allied Arts/Stanford Park
5 minutes ago
Tunbridge Wells is a registered user.
It is entirely appropriate that the costs of parking are borne by the party
 in the best position to avoid that cost. There is no free lunch, and there
is no such thing as free parking. Everyone pays for it, even the people
who don't use it. I suspect that if Menlo Park, Palo Alto, Mountain View,
Redwood City and Los Altos all started charging similar rates for public
parking, a lot more people would figure out how to get to their downtowns
without driving alone in their cars.
Received on Mon Dec 15 2014 - 17:08:14 PST

[ Search ] [ By Date ] [ By Message ] [ By Subject ] [ By Author ]


Email communications sent to the City Council are public records. This site is an archive of emails received by the City Council at its city.council_at_(domainremoved)