Logo


Menlo Park City Council Email Log

[ Home ] [ City Council ] [ Search ] [ 05/06 Archive ] [ 07/08 Archive ] [ 09/10 Archive ] [ 2011 Archive ] [ 12/13 Archive ] [ Watch City Council Meetings ]


Re: Are flawed Staff Reports being used to hasten Commissioner deliberation or to fuel false talking points about Measure M

From: domainremoved <PETER>
Date: Sun, 5 Oct 2014 20:58:31 -0700

> On Oct 5, 2014, at 8:51 PM, Paul Collacchi <pjcoll_at_(domainremoved)
>
> If only a “judge" can decide that then why did a Planner assert it as a matter of fact via hearsay on behalf of an unnamed contract attorney, without qualifying the opinion, and without citing which section of Measure M applied to which of the three amendments, and why?

Because Measure M’s “frustrate” language is, in my opinion, extremely unusual in any legislative document and was included for the express purpose of intimidating the staff and Council from acting in the best interests of the citizens.

Peter
Received on Sun Oct 05 2014 - 20:54:04 PDT

[ Search ] [ By Date ] [ By Message ] [ By Subject ] [ By Author ]


Email communications sent to the City Council are public records. This site is an archive of emails received by the City Council at its city.council_at_(domainremoved)