Logo


Menlo Park City Council Email Log

[ Home ] [ City Council ] [ Search ] [ 05/06 Archive ] [ 07/08 Archive ] [ 09/10 Archive ] [ 2011 Archive ] [ 12/13 Archive ] [ Watch City Council Meetings ]


RE: release of 500 El Camino traffic study

From: Mueller, Raymond <"Mueller,>
Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2014 18:24:03 -0700

Mr. Robinson,

Happy to be helpful. And in response to your earlier emails, Jesse was out of the office Friday and unavailable to finish the report, but once I was advised of the information and conclusions, staff and I agreed that we needed to inform the public the best we could without the final report. That is why the press release occurred prior to the release of the report. We were trying to be as transparent as possible.

With kind regards,
Ray Mueller
________________________________________
From: Heyward Robinson [hrobi_at_(domainremoved)
Sent: Monday, September 29, 2014 5:46 PM
To: Mueller, Raymond
Cc: McIntyre, Alex D; _CCIN
Subject: Re: release of 500 El Camino traffic study

Thanks for clarifying.

Sent from my iPhone

> On Sep 29, 2014, at 5:07 PM, "Mueller, Raymond" <RDMueller_at_(domainremoved)
>
> Mr. Robinson,
>
> Separate from the City Council, I, as Mayor, recieved a high level briefing from Mr. Mcintyre on Friday afternoon, obviously as evidenced by the information contained in the press release and referred to in my quote therein. I didn't recieve the written report until today. It's contents confirmed the briefing I received on Friday. Thank you for your correspondence.
>
> With kind regards,
> Ray Mueller
> ________________________________________
> From: McIntyre, Alex D
> Sent: Monday, September 29, 2014 2:34 PM
> To: Heyward Robinson; _CCIN
> Subject: RE: release of 500 El Camino traffic study
>
> Heyward,
>
> I wanted to take a moment to respond to your e-mail to CCIN.
>
> Most importantly, given the staffing changes that have occurred here over the past 18 month, we have been challenged in focusing on completing the 3rd phase of the 500 ECR report. Interim Public Works Director Jesse Quirion assured both the neighbors and staff that the report would be released no later than October 1.
>
> Given the technical nature of the study, no one outside of the Transportation Division staff has seen the report. Even I still have not seen the report and only late Thursday was briefed on it. The City Council was unaware of the existence of the report, had no early access to the report and its findings and frankly didn't know about the report until we notified them on Friday as to our intent to release it on Monday.
>
> Staff just released it today around 2 PM to all parties (including the City Council).
>
> I hope this clarifies any misconceptions that might exist around the just-released traffic report.
>
> Alex D. McIntyre
> City Manager
> City of Menlo Park
> 701 Laurel Street
> Menlo Park, CA 94025
> (650) 330-6610
> admcintyre_at_(domainremoved)
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Heyward Robinson [mailto:hrobi_at_(domainremoved)
> Sent: Saturday, September 27, 2014 7:14 PM
> To: _CCIN
> Subject: release of 500 El Camino traffic study
>
> On Friday, the City sent out a press release announcing that the long awaited traffic study for 500 El Camino would be released on Monday.
> The contract for this study was approved by the City Council in August of 2013. The study had three parts was to have been completed in 8-10 weeks. Phase one was released in March 2014, phase two in May 2014.
> Now, over 13 months since the contract was approved, the City finally will finally release phase three and the details of neighborhood cut through traffic generated by the proposed Stanford project.
>
> But by sending out a press release without the actual report, the City teases residents with even more delay. Why not release the report on Friday, when its ready? What could possibly justify this delay? As the City is well aware, the results of this study are quite germane to Measure M. In allowing the City Council, all of whom are actively campaigning against Measure M, to see the report before "mere"
> residents, the City gives Measure M's opponents a head start on analyzing the report's details and conclusions. In a hotly contested election, even a few days can make a big difference.
>
> This appears to be yet another example of the City taking sides in the debate over Measure M. Although not surprising, its very disappointing nonetheless.
>
>
> Heyward Robinson
> Menlo Park City Council 2006-2010
Received on Mon Sep 29 2014 - 18:19:41 PDT

[ Search ] [ By Date ] [ By Message ] [ By Subject ] [ By Author ]


Email communications sent to the City Council are public records. This site is an archive of emails received by the City Council at its city.council_at_(domainremoved)