Logo


Menlo Park City Council Email Log

[ Home ] [ City Council ] [ Search ] [ 05/06 Archive ] [ 07/08 Archive ] [ 09/10 Archive ] [ 2011 Archive ] [ Watch City Council Meetings ]


Pope-Chaucer Bridge Replacement

From: domainremoved <Rich>
Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2014 10:40:28 -0800

To:

Jessica Collins, Public Information
                  Representative for the Santa Clara Water District;

San Francisquito Creek Joint Powers Authority

 

Subject:

Pope-Chaucer Bridge Replacement

 

Among the six alternatives presented or discussed in public meetings, our
strong preference is for the alternative that replaces the bridge but
includes NO FLOODWALLS and results in minimum oak loss. (This is Alternative
#3 in the list posted by Save the Oaks.) Both of the alternatives that
require construction of floodwalls are completely unacceptable to us, not
only because of the aesthetic result (destruction of the creek setting that
we love), but also because of the negative impact they would have on
property values.

In the information that we have reviewed, we have seen no mention of how
this project (40 year and future 100-year) is to be financed. One would
think that when comparing the various alternatives, project costs would have
been one of the parameters to compare. Is there any information available on
that?

 

Regards,

Richard and Nancy Walsworth

850 Woodland Court

Menlo Park, CA 94025
Received on Thu Feb 13 2014 - 10:40:09 PST

[ Search ] [ By Date ] [ By Message ] [ By Subject ] [ By Author ]


Email communications sent to the City Council are public records. This site is an archive of emails received by the City Council at its city.council_at_(domainremoved)