Logo


Menlo Park City Council Email Log

[ By Date ] [ By Message ] [ By Subject ] [ By Author ]


Fwd: Neighborhood Meeting for 1706 El Camino Real

From: Susan Basso <bassol_at_(domain_name_was_removed)>
Date: Mon Jun 16 2008 - 12:44:25 PDT

>Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2008 12:43:36 -0700
>To: planning@menlopark.org
>From: Susan Basso <bassol@pacbell.net>
>Subject: Neighborhood Meeting for 1706 El Camino Real
>
>Dear Members of the Planning Commission, City Council, and Others Concerned:
>I would like to protest the number of meetings the average citizen
>of Menlo Park must attend to protect their interests concerning
>the proposed construction of a Medical Building at 1706 El Camino
>Real. First the Planning Commission held a meeting. Citizens
>of the neighborhood dutifully turned out with most taking the
>position that a reduction in the required number of parking places would
>negatively impact the neighborhood. The Planning Commission seemed
>sympathetic to the arguments presented opposing reduced
>parking. I thought at the time that would be fine with no parking
>forced off the site on to residential streets.
>Next I get another notice of a meeting at the Rec Center to discuss
>the same building project with the same issues. I attend that
>meeting as well. When I asked why the meeting was being held, I was
>told by Planning Commission staff it was to inform "staff"
>how citizens felt about the project. Why, I wondered, didn't "staff"
>attend the first Planning Commission meeting on this project?
>Then they would have known what was going on!
>In addition this meeting asked that everyone sit around and discuss
>the project in groups with a mediation team. If ever "busy
>work" was created at tax payer expense, this was it!!!!!
>Now I am invited to attend a THIRD meeting to be a follow up to the
>SECOND meeting about this project (more busy work) to
>take place 6/18/2008. It is as if the City thinks if they just have
>enough meetings, citizens will give up and they can push through
>the project the way they want it. In addition the data from these
>meetings must go to the full Planning Commission and the
>City Council requiring citizens to attend a total of five or six
>meetings on this one small issue. I find this expectation appalling.
>What is the matter with the Planning Commission members that they
>cannot follow the City's ordinances and make a decision!
>I would really like to know what influence the developer of this
>project has with members of the City government that he can
>attend all these meetings well knowing the position of residents of
>the surrounding neighborhood, but still expect that they can
>be influenced to allow him fewer parking spaces?
>I am forwarding this letter to the City Council and other parties
>listed on the flyer and ,if I get mad enough, the local papers!
>Susan Basso, 139 Buckthorn Way, Menlo Park, 325-7255
Received on Mon Jun 16 12:44:32 2008


[ Home ] [ By Date ] [ By Message ] [ By Subject ] [ By Author ] [ 05/06 Archive ]


Email communications sent to the City Council are public records. This site is an archive of emails received by the City Council at its city.council@menlopark.org email address. The posting process is automated and can cause formatting issues when viewed from the website. File attachments sent to this address can be viewed as a link from the main message body. Please note the City Council is also copied on each correspondence. This site can be viewed by the public and sorted by subject, date, author or message thread. The email address of the sender is not disclosed for security purposes. It is the City's practice to remove SPAM (Unsolicited Bulk Email) email from the Council email log. If you believe your email has been removed in error, please contact the City at ccin.log@menlopark.org.