Logo


Menlo Park City Council Email Log

[ By Date ] [ By Message ] [ By Subject ] [ By Author ]


Re: SUSPECT: Re: Palo Alto Police Auditor Final Report for 2006/2007

From: <restorative.justice.for.all_at_(domain_name_was_removed)>
Date: Fri Jun 06 2008 - 09:11:46 PDT


PAPD IPA Officers and Attorneys

No answers and day four - Community accountiblty Mr. Gennaco / Mr. Miller?

On 6/2/08, restorative.justice.for.all@gmail.com < restorative.justice.for.all@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Mr. Gennaco:
>
> Re: Palo Alto Police Auditor Final Report for 2006/2007
>
> Thank you for responding. Having said this, what should concern the Palo
> Alto community at large, is among other things, the number of days it took
> the IPA to respond to my original request.
>
> May 21st, until now, June 2nd. A day short of two weeks. In other words,
> 13 days if my math is correct.
>
> In my opinion, this would certainly be viewed as an
> unacceptable acknowledgment or response time. It sends the wrong signal and
> impression, as to the role of the IPA. Again, your responsiveness.
>
> This should also illistrate and demonstrate a lack of community concern for
> the complaint process. We have no record to prove otherwise or "benchmark'
> as to your and Mr. Millers performance.
>
> You claim; "The IPA does not "investigate" complaints but reviews
> investigations and inquiries conducted by the Palo Alto Police Department."
>
>
> However, the essential function / duties indicates otherwise and there is
> the appearance of ambiguity and obfuscation.
>
> Lets take a closer look......"May receive citizen complaints directly."
> (see your bullet point below)**
>
> If you receive a police complaint directly, do you not "investigate" the
> complainant's request?
>
> If you "investigate" when did your investigation begin and end?
>
> How responsive was the IPA to the complainant's? How long was it before you
> submitted the complaint to the police if in fact you submitted it at all.
> Did the IPA follow-up? *We simply don't know!! More importunately, we
> don't know what were paying for.*
>
> Furthermore, you state; "The 2008 interim report has been completed and is
> being reviewed by the City." Who within the city? Again, we don't know.
>
> In addition, was your interim report late? i.e.quartly report and at what
> point was it due?
>
> Lastly, "The statistics that you ask for are not retrievable in the format
> that you have requested."
>
> This response is tantamount too saying we have *no performance matrix in
> place and therefore not accountable to the community.** *
>
> Mr. Gennaco, your response should raise additional serious community
> concerns, and I find your response and lake of, totally unacceptable,
> fraudulent and misleading. I believe you should know better as an attorney.
>
> Mark
>
>
> cc: State Bar of California
>
>
>
> Independent Police Auditor
>
> The Independent Police Auditor has the authority to review and assess for
> objectivity, thouroughness, and appropriateness of disposition citizen
> complaint investigations of misconduct and internal affairs investigations
> associated with the Police Department and makes recommendations to the
> Police Chief.
>
> *Essential Functions/Duties:
>
> *
>
> - May receive citizen complaints directly.
> - Reviews and assess for objectivity, thouroughness, and
> appropriateness of disposition.
> - Makes recommendations to the Chief of Police regarding further
> investigation, processes, and dispositions.
> - Formally meets with the City Manager and Police Chief once a quarter
> to discuss any issues.
> - Formally meets with the City Council twice a year to discuss issues.
>
>
>
>
> On 6/2/08, Gennaco, Michael J. <MJGennac@lasd.org> wrote:
>>
>> Mr. Petersen-Perez:
>>
>> The statistics that you ask for are not retrievable in the format that you
>> have requested. The questions misconstrue the role of the IPA. The IPA
>> does not "investigate" complaints but reviews investigations and inquiries
>> conducted by the Palo Alto Police Department. For that reason, the time
>> line questions that you request are largely a function of the Department's
>> investigation not those of the IPA. Because we play a reviewing function of
>> the PAPD investigation, there are times in which we have requested
>> additional investigation which may lengthen the time for the Department to
>> complete its investigation. However, it is our view that it is preferable
>> that an investigation be thorough, even if it may take a bit more time to
>> complete.
>>
>> We make it a practice to followup either orally or in writing with each
>> complainant that has contacted us or ensure that the Department does so.
>>
>> The 2008 interim report has been completed and is being reviewed by the
>> City.
>>
>> Michael Gennaco
>>
>> ------------------------------
>> *From:* restorative.justice.for.all@gmail.com [mailto:
>> restorative.justice.for.all@gmail.com]
>> *Sent:* Sunday, June 01, 2008 4:24 PM
>> *To:* Miller, Rob; Gennaco, Michael J.
>> *Cc:* aatito@gmail.com; anna.griffin@rda.sccgov.org;
>> Assemblymember.Leno@assembly.ca.gov; barbara.attard@sanjoseca.gov;
>> betsy237@prodsyse.com; blumesq@aol.com; boyarsky@yahoo.com;
>> brad_imamura@yahoo.com; buzz1857@yahoo.com; cberaldo@att.net;
>> cbrouillet@igc.org; charisse@youthunited.net;
>> citizensagainstpolicebrutality@yahoogroups.com;
>> city.council@cityofpaloalto.org; dennis.burns@cityofpaloalto.org;
>> DHowe@da.sccgov.org; dminkler@dminkler.com; Dolorescarr@da.sccgov.org;
>> Doug.Keith@cityofpaloalto.org; dtomkins@da.sccgov.org; edhawk2@yahoo.com;
>> emily.harrison@cityofpaloalto.org; EveryoneADO@pdo.sccgov.org;
>> frank.benest@cityofpaloalto.org; friendsofpachildrenstheatre@gmail.com;
>> fshun@yahoo.com; Gary.baum@cityofpaloalto.org; gmunks@co.sanmateo.ca.us;
>> Iolmisha@cs.com; jarrar@juno.com; jason.jenkins@cityofpaloalto.org;
>> jay.boyarsky@da.sccgov.org; jaythor@well.com; jbarton@bartonarchitect.com;
>> jfox@co.sanmateo.ca.us; jguy@ado.sccgov.org; jhamiltonca@earthlink.net;
>> judykleinberg@earthlink.net; junisyrus@yahoo.com;
>> justice2003tran@yahoo.com; klein.larry@dorsey.com;
>> kpeterson@dailynewsgroup.com; lcordell@stanford.edu;
>> litigation.in.pro.per@gmail.com; LJLiroff@aol.com;
>> lynne.johnson@cityofpaloalto.org; mark.idoinvoicing@gmail.com;
>> marlo.custodio@gmail.com; mgoldblatt12@gmail.com;
>> Michael.Kan@cityofpaloalto.org; miguel.rodriguez@pdo.sccgov.org;
>> mll2525@yahoo.com; natal7ie@yahoo.com; Natasha.powers@cityofpaloalto.org;
>> nbrewer@pdo.sccgov.org; nklippen@pdo.sccgov.org;
>> noreensalinas@hotmail.com; PDOEveryone@pdo.sccgov.org;
>> peterpan881@gmail.com; print@copyfactory.com; R1Miller;
>> rabbi_zweiback@betham.org; RAY.SAMUELS@newark.org; rmccarthy7@juno.com;
>> Rmccarthy71@aol.com; Ron.Watson@cityofpaloalto.org;
>> sandra.brown@cityofpaloalto.org; sbernardini@scscourt.org;
>> Scott.Mccrossin@ci.los-altos.ca.us; shamako@hiphopcongress.com;
>> svdebug@newamericamedia.org; svdebug@pacificnews.org;
>> Tom.Connelly@ci.los-altos.ca.us; wdbarber@aol.com; youngrebel84@yahoo.com;
>> ytrevino@pdo.sccgov.org; Zachariasb@aol.com; dozer@sprynet.com; Ryan,
>> Dan; abjpd1@juno.com; Wagner, April; april.chan@cityofpaloalto.org; Lum,
>> Patty; Robert.Bonilla@cityofpaloalto.org;
>> donald.larkin@cityofpaloalto.org; Davis, Robert;
>> city.council@menlopark.org; patfoster@aol.com; Jd32451@aol.com;
>> davidwoods01@yahoo.com; rubenxl@aol.com; phantom@dailynewsgroup.com
>> *Subject:* SUSPECT: Re: Palo Alto Police Auditor Final Report for
>> 2006/2007
>>
>>
>>
>> Still no critical answers from the Palo Alto IPA
>>
>>
>>
>> On 5/21/08, restorative.justice.for.all@gmail.com <
>> restorative.justice.for.all@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Mr. Miller / Mr. Gennaco of the IPA for the Palo Alto Police Department:
>>>
>>> Re: Palo Alto Police Auditor Final Report for 2006/2007
>>>
>>> Where is the first report and why was it not posted / included or found
>>> at the police community website?
>>>
>>> In addition, report fails to indicate the following *performance matrix*
>>> :
>>>
>>> - Date and time complaints were received by the IPA.
>>> - Date and time IPA investigation initiated.
>>> - Date and time complaint was finalized.
>>> - Total number of days to finalize.
>>> - Complainant follow-up.
>>> - IPA interim report for 2008
>>>
>>>
>>> Please explain why this important piece of community IPA performance
>>> matrix was not included.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> "It is said that power corrupts, but actually it's more true that power
>> attracts the corruptible. The sane are usually attracted by other things
>> than power."
>>
>> David Brin quotes (American science-fiction writer b.1950
>>
>
>
>
> --
> "It is said that power corrupts, but actually it's more true that power
> attracts the corruptible. The sane are usually attracted by other things
> than power."
>
> David Brin quotes (American science-fiction writer b.1950
>

-- 
"It is said that power corrupts, but actually it's more true that power
attracts the corruptible. The sane are usually attracted by other things
than power."

David Brin quotes (American science-fiction writer b.1950
Received on Fri Jun 6 09:12:12 2008

[ Home ] [ By Date ] [ By Message ] [ By Subject ] [ By Author ] [ 05/06 Archive ]


Email communications sent to the City Council are public records. This site is an archive of emails received by the City Council at its city.council@menlopark.org email address. The posting process is automated and can cause formatting issues when viewed from the website. File attachments sent to this address can be viewed as a link from the main message body. Please note the City Council is also copied on each correspondence. This site can be viewed by the public and sorted by subject, date, author or message thread. The email address of the sender is not disclosed for security purposes. It is the City's practice to remove SPAM (Unsolicited Bulk Email) email from the Council email log. If you believe your email has been removed in error, please contact the City at ccin.log@menlopark.org.