Sorry, I'm resending......I forgot to include all others in my response....

On 5/27/08, restorative.justice.for.all@gmail.com < restorative.justice.for.all@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Mr. Larkin:
>
> I believe the codes which you are referring to are labor codes? And may or
> may not apply to Mr. Shapiro under and "Pursuant to Government Code
> section 12940(j)," However, the question to consider is "third" party
> harassment caused by the originating party and its prevention and causes.
> That being chief Johnson.
>
> In other words, does in fact, Chief Johnson promote community intimidation,
> fear and hostilities causing one to respond in a like fashion and manner.
> More importantly, could it have been prevented. (case in point - Children's
> Theater scandal)
>
> "good nite and good luck"
>
> Mark
>
>
>
> On 5/27/08, POLICE ACCOUNTABILITY. WHEN? <buzz1857@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>
>> First of all, you piece of garbage, I wasn't the originator of the "thong"
>> email, although I agree fully and repletely that she is scum of the earth
>> and not fit for any public-trust job, much less broom pusher. I will write
>> said criticism as I so choose.
>>
>> Please, I beg you, Mr. Dirt-bag, bring on your "necessary actions." I'm
>> already going to see you in court for chilling my iron clad protected first
>> amendment rights. A second, counter complaint, will suit me, et al, just
>> fine.
>>
>> P.S., Happy to discuss this on the phone at anytime, you have my number
>> several times over. Pursuant to your cowardly personal constitution, I doubt
>> I'll hear from you anytime soon.
>>
>> Oh, and this is great further evidence in the case I will already be
>> filing against your city that you have no qualms about threatening and
>> chilling a citizen''s free speech rights.
>>
>> It's called the "spam" button. Ever heard of it, you f'ing moron?
>>
>> Thank you, Richard Shapiro
>>
>> *"Larkin, Donald" <Donald.Larkin@CityofPaloAlto.org>* wrote:
>>
>> Mr. Shapiro
>> Your recent correspondence is offensive, unreasonable and unnecessary for
>> the conduct of business with the City. Pursuant to Government Code section
>> 12940(j), the City is required to make reasonable efforts to protect its
>> employees from unlawful harassment by members of the public. You have
>> crossed the line, and it must stop. If you continue to abuse the City's
>> e-mail system by making offensive, harmful or false accusations against City
>> employees, we will take all reasonably necessary measures to protect our
>> employees.
>> Donald Larkin
>> Assistant City Attorney
>> City of Palo Alto
>> (650) 329-2171
>> donald.larkin@cityofpaloalto.org
>> This e-mail may contain confidential and/or attorney-client privileged
>> material. If you have received this message in error, please immediately
>> notify the sender and delete this e-mail message from your computer.
>> ------------------------------
>> *From:* POLICE ACCOUNTABILITY. WHEN? [mailto:buzz1857@yahoo.com]
>> *Sent:* Friday, May 23, 2008 9:58 AM
>> *Subject:* Chief Lynne Johnson's stench ridden thong is not between her
>> legs, it's between her ears.
>>
>>
>>
>> *restorative.justice.for.all@gmail.com* wrote:
>> Chief Johnson's "Thongs" set for auction!
>> *To cover her legal expense's on pending Children's Theater litigation*
>>
>>
>> The discription reads:...a little "crusty with skid marks" It is has
>> also been reported....she will throw in the "Oil painting by Munks" to boot!
>> *(see description below)*
>>
>>
>> On 5/19/08, *restorative.justice.for.all@gmail.com* <
>> restorative.justice.for.all@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> Her habit of rubbing people the wrong way goes back a long time..........
>>
>>
>> [image: Thongs as underwear — a traditional thong on the left, a G-string
>> on the right] <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Lower_Back_Tattoos.jpg>
>> *Chief Lynne Johnson even donned "appropriate clothing," as she put it,
>> and posed as a masseuse,*
>>
>> [image: the-chief.jpg]
>>
>>
>>
>> Then and Now
>> http://www.paloaltodailynews.com/article/2008-5-11-then-and-now<http://www.paloaltodailynews.com/article/2008-5-11-then-and-now>
>> Palo Alto's own sex in the city
>> By Matt Bowling / Daily News columnist
>> According to the late newspaper editor and historian Ward Winslow, Palo
>> Alto once had an "unwanted reputation as the Peninsula's largest sex-shop
>> center."
>>
>> These days that may seem a little hard to imagine, but in the mid-1970s,
>> the El Camino Real strip through Barron Park was lined with massage parlors.
>> And as it turned out, they were offering a little more than just your basic
>> stress-relieving rubdown.
>>
>> The onslaught of adult fare came to Palo Alto in 1972 when a few mature
>> bookstores moved in to empty properties along El Camino Real. They were soon
>> joined by the X-rated Copenhagen Theatre at 3898 El Camino Real, the same
>> building that later held the Santa Clara County Democratic Headquarters.
>>
>> Before long, a number of massage parlors began to pop up throughout the
>> city and by the winter of 1974, 10 massage parlors with names like "The
>> Streaker" and "The Foxy Lady" blanketed an eight-block stretch along the old
>> King's Highway.
>>
>> Crime and blight soon followed. Women complained of being propositioned
>> while walking down the street and more family friendly businesses struggled
>> to survive. Crime reports in the area were up, and sales were down. And by
>> 1974, questions were being raised about what was really going on inside
>> those massage parlors.
>>
>> The Palo Alto police, at no small cost, organized a sting operation. Using
>> mostly undercover officers from cities nearby, police confirmed that most of
>> the parlors were little more than houses of prostitution. They accumulated
>> more than 100 sworn statements that they then took to court.
>>
>> As was later reported to the press, various sexual services were being
>> offered as "extras" at the parlors with prices ranging between $30 and $100
>>
>> Police spokesmen were quick to add that undercover officers had turned
>> down all such offers.
>>
>> Many of the parlor owners were actually legal Nevada brothel owners
>> importing registered prostitutes to offer their services in Palo Alto.
>>
>> Following the precedent set the previous year in Fremont, the Palo Alto
>> police sought to close the parlors under the Red Light Abatement Act - a
>> state anti-prostitution law dusted off from 1913. Armed with a court order
>> from Judge Peter Arnello, the police acted quickly and decisively. At dawn
>> on Friday, Dec. 3, 1976, teams of police officers, locksmiths and movers
>> closed down most of the parlors down in hours, padlocking all 17
>> illegitimate massage parlors in Palo Alto.
>>
>> In so doing, further evidence collected essentially ended any real hopes
>> for the parlors to reopen in the city. Operators and masseuses were fined
>> and, in some cases, put in jail. The police also went after some of the
>> "Johns," as well. Current police *Chief Lynne Johnson even donned
>> "appropriate clothing," as she put it, and posed as a masseuse,* catching
>> men on record asking for services which were not quite legal. One arrested
>> attorney allegedly intended to pay for the services with a check from his
>> wife with a note that read "Happy Birthday."
>>
>> Following the raid, the Palo Alto City Council put heavy restrictions on
>> adult businesses that wanted to set up shop. A string of tight controls were
>> also put on massage parlors - including bans on halter tops, tipping and
>> massages after 11 p.m. Such rules have sometimes made business more
>> difficult for legitimate relaxation centers. However, it's been more than 30
>> years since the massage parlor crackdown, and there has not been much
>> X-rated activity about the city since.
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> "Aim for success, not perfection. Never give up your right to be wrong,
>> because then you will lose the ability to learn new things and move forward
>> with your life. Remember that fear always lurks behind perfectionism.
>> Confronting your fears and allowing yourself the right to be human can,
>> paradoxically, make yourself a happier and more productive person."
>>
>> Dr. David M. Burns
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> "It is said that power corrupts, but actually it's more true that power
>> attracts the corruptible. The sane are usually attracted by other things
>> than power."
>>
>> David Brin quotes (American science-fiction writer b.1950
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> "It is said that power corrupts, but actually it's more true that power
> attracts the corruptible. The sane are usually attracted by other things
> than power."
>
> David Brin quotes (American science-fiction writer b.1950
>
>

-- 
"It is said that power corrupts, but actually it's more true that power
attracts the corruptible. The sane are usually attracted by other things
than power."

David Brin quotes (American science-fiction writer b.1950




application/pdf attachment: california_codes_section_12940-12951.pdf



text/html attachment: SALAZAR_v._Diversified_Court_of_Appeals_Cal.htm