Logo


Menlo Park City Council Email Log

[ Home ] [ City Council ] [ Search ] [ 05/06 Archive ] [ 07/08 Archive ] [ 09/10 Archive ] [ 2011 Archive ] [ 12/13 Archive ] [ Watch City Council Meetings ]


USGS & RV parking

From: domainremoved <Vadim>
Date: Fri, 6 Dec 2019 21:18:04 -0800

CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Unless you recognize the sender's email address and know the content is safe, DO NOT click links, open attachments or reply.

Menlo Park City Council,

My wife and I are residents of Menlo Park in Linfield Oaks - only a stone's-throw from the USGS campus. We are alarmed to hear that our city leaders are seriously entertaining the idea of using one of our prized neighborhoods for RV parking. Not only do we oppose this idea, but we see no reason why our city feels compelled to provide parking for people living in their vehicles. Will the city also provide equal-value services to the rest of its residents? Will the RV inhabitants be paying their fair share of property tax, utility services, vehicle registrtation & insurance, and rent - just like the rest of our city's residents? Will the city be providing sewage dumping and showers? Is the city prepared to compensate homeowners for the loss in value to their homes? Furthermore, is the city prepared to pay for the colossal legal fight they will incur due to this self-inflicted damage?

Action such as this makes us seriously doubt the competency of our city's leadership. Clearly, this is not what the majority of our local residents want - yet this idea is under consideration?! Bay Road in East Palo Alto was cited in the Daily Post as an example of another such RV transition site - have any of you ever been to that site? We have. We also have spoken to local business owners about the crime present due to the RV residents breaking in every night. We have witnessed the filth, trash, needles, and other drug paraphernalia strewn throughout that area. That is what you propose to bring into our community? This is where our neighborhood children should be playing? Really?

Council members, what is the reason you - as the representatives of our city and the best interests of its law-abiding, tax-paying, hard working residents - feel compelled to provide parking for RV inhabitants? There are far more sensible locations that would utilize property of a value more representative of the group it serves. It is likely some of these people will choose to relocate to a community more in-line with their needs and means - why interfere with that process? That is the natural evolution of communities - some grow, others shrink. When residents move in, increasing property demand, some people may choose to relocate to lower-demand areas that reflect the income level of their residents.

Please tell us how many people stand on each side of this issue? When was this survey conducted? We never received a questionnaire on this topic. As such, we hereby state our firm votes against this terrible idea.

--
Vadim & Alena Konings
Sherwood Way, MP
This e-mail is for the use of the intended recipient(s) only. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and then delete it. If you are not the intended recipient, you must not use, disclose or distribute this e-mail without the author's prior permission. We have taken precautions to minimise the risk of transmitting software viruses, but we advise you to carry out your own virus checks on any attachment to this message. We cannot accept liability for any loss or damage caused by software viruses. If you are the intended recipient and you do not wish to receive similar electronic messages from us in future then please respond to the sender to this effect.
Received on Fri Dec 06 2019 - 21:09:00 PST

[ Search ] [ By Date ] [ By Message ] [ By Subject ] [ By Author ]


Email communications sent to the City Council are public records. This site is an archive of emails received by the City Council at its city.council_at_(domainremoved)