Menlo Park City Council Email Log

[ Home ] [ City Council ] [ Search ] [ 05/06 Archive ] [ 07/08 Archive ] [ 09/10 Archive ] [ 2011 Archive ] [ 12/13 Archive ] [ Watch City Council Meetings ]

Re: City Council priority setting - capital project priorities

From: domainremoved <Karen>
Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2019 16:28:00 +0000

Great letter!

From: Adina Levin <aldeivnian_at_(domainremoved)
Date: Tuesday, January 15, 2019 at 11:43 PM
To: "city.council_at_(domainremoved)
Subject: City Council priority setting - capital project priorities

Honorable Council Members,

This note is in regard to the Council priority-setting session now scheduled for February.

I would like to urge City Council to create a process to prioritize the city's important and higher-cost infrastructure capital projects.

In the last year, one of the challenging topics in the public dialog was the question about whether to accept a gift to rebuild the main library. The donor backed out of the offer, partly because the city was not wholly enthusiastic about taking on the project at the time.

One of the problems was that there were major strings attached to the gift - it would have obligated the city to come up with $20-$30 Million additional dollars to complete the construction of the library. At the time, the city council had no clear process to discuss whether and where this library project would fit into the city's priority list of major capital projects - and what the consequences would have been to other priorities if the city had taken on the library building project.

At the same time, there are a variety of other substantial capital projects in the queue:

* the city has already decided to build a bike/pedestrian crossing at Middle Ave across the Caltrain tracks. Stanford has agreed to pay $5M toward the cost of the project, and the city will likely need to come up with a substantial amount of additional funds to complete the project.

* the city is considering options for Caltrain grade separation. While typically cities contribute "local match" funding that is relatively small compared to the overall project, whose largest sources of funding come from County, Regional, State, and sometimes Federal sources, a 10% local match for a grade separation would also been in the $20 to $30M range.

* the city is considering a potential downtown parking garage, which could also have costs to the city in the low tens of millions of dollars.

The city does have the ability to raise local funds for these sorts of important capital projects. But probably not all at exactly the same time.

It would be valuable for the city council to prioritize major capital projects, assess the financial capacity to take on such projects at any point in time, and develop a process to revisit the priority list when an opportunity arises to add new items to the queue such as a new library building.

The city does have a Capital Improvement Plan process, but this includes many items, larger and smaller. It would be valuable to have a special process for the smaller set of more expensive projects that will require the city to take on additional taxes and financing to deliver.

With such a process, the Council could make deliberate tradeoffs about the benefits and consequences of taking on a new project, rather than being reactive to new items that pop up.

Thank you for your consideration,

- Adina
Adina Levin
Menlo Park Resident
Received on Wed Jan 16 2019 - 09:14:39 PST

[ Search ] [ By Date ] [ By Message ] [ By Subject ] [ By Author ]

Email communications sent to the City Council are public records. This site is an archive of emails received by the City Council at its city.council_at_(domainremoved)