[ By Date ] [ By Message ] [ By Subject ] [ By Author ]
It delights me when the opportunity arises to provide another point
of view about urban transit. Here is one by Russ Peterson, a Felton
Gables neighbor who has given much thought to these issues which we
have discussed in these emails over the past several years.
Martin
=============================================
>My offer to the VISION of transit for the Peninsula and Greater Bay
>Area is busing. Here's why:
>
>- Flexibility of equipment - diesel, hybrid diesel, electric, CNG,
>whatever, is the BEST technology to accomplish the mission
>(convenient service that people will want to use). Note: electric
>means both wired and 100% battery powered (new technology from a
>company in Reno, NV, is allowing new hi-density power packs to fully
>charge a battery pack in 5-10 minutes not hours).
>
>- Flexibility of Routing - move with the redevelopment plans of any
>city, the swings in job growth/decline, and the location/relocation
>of employers. Adjust to special events scheduling on the fly such
>as ball games, conventions, and even offer something for long term
>events like the Olympics.
>
>-Flexibility of Scheduling - More and smaller units can provide
>expanded services through smart technologies linked directly to a
>commuters pass. For example, an empty unit pulls into Sunnyvale
>station and 5 people want to go to Stanford Hospital. If the system
>knows 10 more people up the line want to go to Stanford and
>historical data suggests at least 5 more should arrive at stations
>soon the system can dedicate a unit to that trip. Likewise it can
>add another unit for passengers traveling elsewhere that the first
>unit would not pick up.
>
>- Economic Flexibility - grow the system more incrementally than a
>large, captive, rail system with associated capital costs and
>rights-of-way acquisitions. Start by using surface streets and if
>the need truly grows then truly grow the system. Now, we try to
>grow after we think there is a need--which means people have already
>been forced to use their cars to get where they are going (try
>pulling them out after that).
>
>- Environmental Flexibility - Express or "hi-speed" equipment may
>differ from local route units based on getting the most
>environmentally sound units for that purpose (long trips, short
>trips, hi-speed, etc.). This would allow for a Better Environmental
>solution to reduce pollutants over our current systems. The side
>benefit appears that, however politically incorrect this is, the
>poor can go by local bus and the wealthy "commuters" can go by
>hi-speed equipment if that is truly what is happening per recent
>studies.
>
>It may be tilting at windmills but this is where things have to go
>to meet the actual needs of commuters...where is the Sierra Club and
>CalPIRG when you need them.
>
>Regards,
>
>Russ
-- ********************** Martin Engel 1621 Stone Pine Lane Menlo Park, CA 94025 650:323-1670 martinengel@earthlink.net **********************Received on Thu Apr 19 23:33:53 2007
[ Home ] [03-04 Archive] [05-06 Archive] [ By Date ] [ By Message ] [ By Subject ] [ By Author ]
Email communications sent to the City Council are public records. This site is an archive of emails received by the City Council at its city.council@menlopark.org email address. This site can be viewed by the public and sorted by subject, date, author or message thread. The email address of the sender is not disclosed for security purposes. It is the City's practice to remove SPAM (Unsolicited Bulk Email) email from the Council email log. If you believe your email has been removed in error, please contact the City at ccin.log@menlopark.org.