Logo


Menlo Park City Council Email Log

[ By Date ] [ By Message ] [ By Subject ] [ By Author ]


Re: Grass versus Artificial Turf

From: laure laprais <llaprais_at_(domain_name_was_removed)>
Date: Fri Mar 23 2007 - 09:10:17 PST

Terry,

I appreciate you're being defiant of industries trying
to spin facts to promote their products.
I want to reassure you I don't represent the Sod
industry, nor do I have the intention to.
I'm not advocating for Sod, just grass. Since we are
all in a hurry to have a field by fall 2007, planting
from seeds is probably not realistic.

If I may quote the comment from an Encinal 10y old who
played soccer on an artificial turf:
1. It really hurts when you fall on it
2. It is really bad for the environment

We all may argue about #2, but not about #1.

Laure

--- Terry Thygesen <thygesen_terry@yahoo.com> wrote:

> Dear Ms. Wainscoat,
>
> Artificial turf is not even under consideration for
> Laurel school.
> It is not at all helpful to our decision-making
> process to generate
> petitions. Anyone who has questions or concerns
> should contact us
> directly instead.
>
> Terry
>
> On Mar 23, 2007, at 8:14 AM, Kimberly wrote:
>
> > Dear Terry & Ahmad,
> > Our Laurel campus lawn is organically fertilized
> and free of
> > chemicals and pesticides this year. We had planned
> to do this with
> > the Enicnal field as well beginning fall 2007.
> Laurel is on the way
> > to becoming the nation's first Zero Waste and
> Sustainable public
> > school campus and Encinal and Oak Knoll are
> following suit this
> > year. I am working with the EPA in Sacramento and
> in touch with the
> > Governor's office. They are watching our
> development to see how we
> > pull this off. A "throw away" artificial turf does
> not fit with
> > "zero waste" or sustainability. It would go to the
> landfill at
> > least every eight years, and then we must pay
> again to replace it.
> >
> > There is a large petition going around with at
> least 300 signatures
> > in just a few days of families opposed to
> artificial turf at the
> > school. I suspect the board and Mr. Ranella will
> soon receive it.
> >
> > Also, the neighbors in Felton Gables bordering the
> school are
> > actively opposing the turf as they are seeking to
> protect their
> > heritage oak trees.
> >
> > Sincerely,
> > Kimberly Wainscoat
> >
> > On Mar 22, 2007, at 11:43 PM, Terry Thygesen
> wrote:
> >
> >> Dear Ms. Wainscoat,
> >>
> >> Thank you for your comments. We are actively
> considering the
> >> possibility of artificial turf on one of the
> Encinal fields as a
> >> way to increase the usability of the field and
> also to mitigate
> >> the negative environmental effects from the
> significant water
> >> usage and chemical fertilizers required by grass
> fields. I have
> >> copied our facility planner/program manager,
> Ahmad Sheikoleslami,
> >> so that he can make sure that your concerns about
> potential
> >> negative impacts of artificial turf are
> considered by our district
> >> facility planning team. We will carefully
> evaluate the pluses and
> >> minuses before making any decision, and we will
> also be careful to
> >> consider the source of all information we
> evaluate since there are
> >> self-interested advocates for both the artificial
> turf as well as
> >> the grass sod industries who are spinning the
> facts to promote
> >> their products.
> >>
> >> Best Regards,
> >>
> >> Terry Thygesen
> >> President, Board of Trustees
> >> Menlo Park City School District
> >>
> >> On Mar 20, 2007, at 10:23 PM, Kimberly wrote:
> >>
> >>> Dear Mr. Ranella and the MPCSD Board,
> >>>
> >>> I am a parent in this district and I understand
> the School Board
> >>> of Menlo Park is considering replacing the grass
> fields at
> >>> Encinal and Laurel with artificial turf. I
> strongly believe that
> >>> artificial turf on any school campus is highly
> inappropriate.
> >>>
> >>> A major environmental problem with artificial
> grass is that heavy
> >>> metals in the materials can leach into our water
> table causing
> >>> serious environmental damage and potential
> cleanup costs that
> >>> could far exceed any cost saving considerations
> associated with
> >>> the use of artificial turf.
> >>>
> >>> Our environment here in California is quite
> temperate and it's
> >>> very easy to grow grass. Fields gets plenty of
> light, we do not
> >>> have snow, and we do not have excessive rains
> that create mud. We
> >>> also do not have excessive drought conditions
> that would prevent
> >>> us from watering lawns. We are also one of the
> wealthiest public
> >>> school districts on the planet, so the argument
> that we may save
> >>> a few bucks not having to water or mow a lawn is
> absurd.
> >>>
> >>> Natural lawn has a superior ability to trap and
> bring in water
> >>> through it's ecosystem. In addition, grass
> enhances soil water
> >>> infiltration and recharges groundwater. Imagine
> if every school,
> >>> park and backyard in our community had
> artificial turf covering
> >>> it? What would this do to our water table? May I
> remind you that
> >>> real grass provides homes to an entire ecosystem
> of creatures
> >>> such as butterflies, worms, and beetles. This is
> an educational
> >>> environment, not just a soccer area. Real grass
> can provide a
> >>> sport space and a science lesson or two.
> Artificial turf cannot
> >>> do both.
> >>>
> >>> Other issue with artificial turf includes:
> >>> —It can smell bad.
> >>> —Heavy chemicals would be need to disinfect the
> turf
> >>> periodically since it does not absorb body
> fluids the way grass
> >>> does, fluids such as blood, soda, food, sweat,
> and urine or feces
> >>> from animals and possibly humans.
> >>> — Friction between skin and some types of
> artificial turf causes
> >>> abrasions and/or burns to a much greater extent
> than natural
> >>> grass. This is an issue for some sports: for
> example, soccer in
> >>> which sliding maneuvers are common and clothing
> does not fully
> >>> cover the limbs.
> >>> —Turf toe, or metatarsalphalangeal joint sprain,
> is a physical
> >>> injury often associated with playing on
> artificial turf. Turf toe
> >>> can often progress into a chronic problem, in
> which the joint(s)
> >>> never really heals or heals too slowly to return
> to usual
> >>> physical activity (not god for developing
> children).
> >>> —A lot of rubber can get into shoes.
> >>>
> >>> Dear Board, you will have more parents
> impassioned about
> >>> preserving the natural environment and
> protecting it than parents
> >>> going around praising more synthetic and
> artificial products
> >>> directly in our children's environment.
> >>>
> >>> Sincerely,
> >>> Aaron and Kimberly Wainscoat
> >>> Menlo Park
> >>>
> >>
> >
>
>

 
____________________________________________________________________________________
Sucker-punch spam with award-winning protection.
Try the free Yahoo! Mail Beta.
http://advision.webevents.yahoo.com/mailbeta/features_spam.html
Received on Fri Mar 23 10:10:35 2007


[ Home ] [03-04 Archive] [05-06 Archive] [ By Date ] [ By Message ] [ By Subject ] [ By Author ]


Email communications sent to the City Council are public records. This site is an archive of emails received by the City Council at its city.council@menlopark.org email address. This site can be viewed by the public and sorted by subject, date, author or message thread. The email address of the sender is not disclosed for security purposes. It is the City's practice to remove SPAM (Unsolicited Bulk Email) email from the Council email log. If you believe your email has been removed in error, please contact the City at ccin.log@menlopark.org.